Quick Empire Question, Detachments
| Tyrion |
|

the one and only
       
Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,012
Member No.: 240
Joined: 9-November 03

|
| QUOTE (Thragka @ Aug 18 2007, 02:32 PM) | | QUOTE | | I wonder if a Bretonnian BSB could take a magical lance, though... |
If the paragraph talking about BSBs in the Bretonnian book is the same as usual, with something to the effect of "may not take extra non-magical equipment but for light or heavy armour as appropriate", then, yes, magical lances are allowed. As for the fairness of Empire special rules, I can't comment on it, having only played Empire once and being righteously slaughtered very early on in the game. |
Again, if he cant have a lance, how come he can have a magical one? Doesnt make any sense  .
--------------------
Orcs & Goblins painted: 15 Night Goblins
|
|
|
| Benedictus |
|

Reformed Dropout
       
Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,772
Member No.: 702
Joined: 22-March 04

|
Yes, Handgunners can have a detachment. It is very common to see 10-strong units with 5-strong detachments, especially in firestorm of death armies.
BSBs can take magical items all they want, with the usual restrictions on a fighting character (no dispel scrolls, 50 points limit, etc). The fact that they cannot have a mundane lance, but can have a magical one? Magical weapons are usually lighter than mundane equivalents, due to magical energies or some gobbledeygook.
@ztech: YOU try carrying a ten feet long pole in each hand, keeping one vertical and the other horizontal and see how well YOU do.
Thragka: Why can't they have an enchanted shield? 'S far as I can tell they can.
--------------------
Current Reading: Otherland, Tad Williams.
Last Read: Byzantine Iconoclasm During the Reign of Leo III: With Particular Attention to the Oriental Sources, Stephen Gero.
|
|
|
| Thragka |
|

Patrician
      
Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 570
Member No.: 1,556
Joined: 1-July 06

|
| QUOTE | | Thragka: Why can't they have an enchanted shield? 'S far as I can tell they can. |
Uhhh ... on further research, it appears that this point is kind of ambiguous. Looking at the lizardman book, it reads "They may not carry any non-magical weapons, nor may they use a shield". I had always taken this to mean that they couldn't take any sort of shield, magical or not, as the words "non-magical" refers only to weapons in this case.
However, the new greenskin book makes no reference whatsoever to shields, just saying "no mundane equipment that's not armour unless it's magical". Under that condition, it looks like magical shields are allowed.
So, sorry, my mistake.
--------------------
A bad simile is like a leaky screwdriver.
|
|
|
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
Visit www.warhammerworkshop.com and www.warhammerforums.com!
 |