This skin was created by Lightz of the IF Skin Zone.


Forum Rules Rules of Warhammer Palace
Pages: (2) [1] 2  ( Go to first unread post )

 Quick Empire Question, Detachments
Tombguard321
Posted: Aug 13 2007, 07:34 PM


Champion of Darkness


Group: Admin
Posts: 1,466
Member No.: 2
Joined: 18-March 03



Can Handgunners unit of 10 take a small detachment of 5 Handgunners? As i said quick question.

........................

Doesn't matter it is covered in detachments :_D


--------------------
user posted image

Tombguard, the harvestor of souls
Top
KingTut
Posted: Aug 15 2007, 11:06 PM


Ultimate Warrior


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 304
Member No.: 1,582
Joined: 1-October 06



Leeching on to this topic,
Can a captain be a bsb with a lance?
I dont thinks so but a blueshirt convinced me otherwise however he was talking about brettonnia.
Top
Dark Lord Jim
Posted: Aug 16 2007, 04:24 AM


Powered by swarms of angry bees


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,195
Member No.: 87
Joined: 31-May 03



As a rule, Battle Standard Bearers are not allowed to take any additional weapons or a shield, as they need both hands to carry the standard. They can only be upgraded with light or heavy armour and a steed (barded or non-barded). Bretonnian BSB's come with a lance, but this is an exception to the rule.

Cheers,
DLJ


--------------------
Top
Tyrion
Posted: Aug 16 2007, 08:53 AM


the one and only


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,012
Member No.: 240
Joined: 9-November 03



And surely handgunners arent a parent unit?


--------------------
user posted image

Orcs & Goblins painted: 15 Night Goblins
Top
@ztech
Posted: Aug 16 2007, 09:17 AM


Trusted lieutenant of Lord Asriel


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,746
Member No.: 839
Joined: 21-May 04



QUOTE (Dark Lord Jim @ Aug 16 2007, 04:24 AM)
Bretonnian BSB's come with a lance, but this is an exception to the rule.

Wrong. They come only with heavy armor and they're not allowed to have a lance.

I don't see why a BSB couldn't have a lance or a spear, since those weapons take only one hand. But it's the way the rules are made. dry.gif

I wonder if a Bretonnian BSB could take a magical lance, though...


QUOTE (Tyrion)
And surely handgunners arent a parent unit?

My thoughts exactly. I doubt handgunners can have detachments.
.

This post has been edited by @ztech on Aug 16 2007, 09:19 AM


--------------------
user posted image


Currently reading: Nothing for the moment.
Top
KingTut
Posted: Aug 16 2007, 01:31 PM


Ultimate Warrior


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 304
Member No.: 1,582
Joined: 1-October 06



They are state troops and benifit from all rules concerning state troops
so they can have detachments
Top
Tyrion
Posted: Aug 18 2007, 07:54 AM


the one and only


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,012
Member No.: 240
Joined: 9-November 03



QUOTE
My thoughts exactly. I doubt handgunners can have detachments.
.


If one cant have a mundane version of a weapon, then usually one cant have a magical version of it either.


--------------------
user posted image

Orcs & Goblins painted: 15 Night Goblins
Top
Tombguard321
Posted: Aug 18 2007, 10:09 AM


Champion of Darkness


Group: Admin
Posts: 1,466
Member No.: 2
Joined: 18-March 03



This has went well off topic I was enquiring about detachment rules for the empire. No where in my original post did i mention Bretonnian.


--------------------
user posted image

Tombguard, the harvestor of souls
Top
Burro Boskov
Posted: Aug 18 2007, 12:52 PM


Emperor


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 505
Member No.: 1,517
Joined: 31-March 06



Yes well all knight's are evil gits, who are obvious trying to compensate for something by waving around large sticks and trying to make themselves taller then everyone else.

[/grumble]

Just spent a day battling an allied Brettonian and Empire force. So many 2+ or 1+ armour saves. Oh, and the empire guy also had a steam tank!

Sure the posts went off topic, but it was on topic off topic, rather than my post so far which has been off topic completely. Yet somehow slightly relates to the topic.

And now for something on topic-

I think the amount of special rules the Empire has for their infantry units is a little unfair. Combi charging isn't that bad, because if someone is foolish enough to let them selves get flanked by a unit it's their fault.

But for the stand and shoot rule, its very powerful, espicially if the parent unit is a ranged unit, and so is the detachment.

Burro Boskov


--------------------
user posted image

There baby. And wondering what to do now.
Top
Thragka
Posted: Aug 18 2007, 02:32 PM


Patrician


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 570
Member No.: 1,556
Joined: 1-July 06



QUOTE
I wonder if a Bretonnian BSB could take a magical lance, though...

If the paragraph talking about BSBs in the Bretonnian book is the same as usual, with something to the effect of "may not take extra non-magical equipment but for light or heavy armour as appropriate", then, yes, magical lances are allowed.

As for the fairness of Empire special rules, I can't comment on it, having only played Empire once and being righteously slaughtered very early on in the game. rolleyes.gif


--------------------
A bad simile is like a leaky screwdriver.

user posted image
Top
Tyrion
Posted: Aug 19 2007, 11:28 AM


the one and only


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,012
Member No.: 240
Joined: 9-November 03



QUOTE (Thragka @ Aug 18 2007, 02:32 PM)
QUOTE
I wonder if a Bretonnian BSB could take a magical lance, though...

If the paragraph talking about BSBs in the Bretonnian book is the same as usual, with something to the effect of "may not take extra non-magical equipment but for light or heavy armour as appropriate", then, yes, magical lances are allowed.

As for the fairness of Empire special rules, I can't comment on it, having only played Empire once and being righteously slaughtered very early on in the game. rolleyes.gif

Again, if he cant have a lance, how come he can have a magical one? Doesnt make any sense rolleyes.gif .


--------------------
user posted image

Orcs & Goblins painted: 15 Night Goblins
Top
Thragka
Posted: Aug 19 2007, 01:41 PM


Patrician


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 570
Member No.: 1,556
Joined: 1-July 06



Yeah, it is a bit strange. There's also the question of why a BSB can't have a magical shield if they can have a magical weapon. Just another one of life's mysteries, I suppose.


--------------------
A bad simile is like a leaky screwdriver.

user posted image
Top
Benedictus
Posted: Aug 19 2007, 05:39 PM


Reformed Dropout


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,772
Member No.: 702
Joined: 22-March 04



Yes, Handgunners can have a detachment. It is very common to see 10-strong units with 5-strong detachments, especially in firestorm of death armies.

BSBs can take magical items all they want, with the usual restrictions on a fighting character (no dispel scrolls, 50 points limit, etc). The fact that they cannot have a mundane lance, but can have a magical one? Magical weapons are usually lighter than mundane equivalents, due to magical energies or some gobbledeygook.

@ztech: YOU try carrying a ten feet long pole in each hand, keeping one vertical and the other horizontal and see how well YOU do.

Thragka: Why can't they have an enchanted shield? 'S far as I can tell they can.


--------------------
Current Reading: Otherland, Tad Williams.

Last Read: Byzantine Iconoclasm During the Reign of Leo III: With Particular Attention to the Oriental Sources, Stephen Gero.
Top
Tyrion
Posted: Aug 20 2007, 07:51 AM


the one and only


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2,012
Member No.: 240
Joined: 9-November 03



What does the BRB say on this matter? Dont have mine nearby unfortunatly tongue.gif .


--------------------
user posted image

Orcs & Goblins painted: 15 Night Goblins
Top
Thragka
Posted: Aug 20 2007, 08:24 AM


Patrician


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 570
Member No.: 1,556
Joined: 1-July 06



QUOTE
Thragka: Why can't they have an enchanted shield? 'S far as I can tell they can.

Uhhh ... on further research, it appears that this point is kind of ambiguous. Looking at the lizardman book, it reads "They may not carry any non-magical weapons, nor may they use a shield". I had always taken this to mean that they couldn't take any sort of shield, magical or not, as the words "non-magical" refers only to weapons in this case.

However, the new greenskin book makes no reference whatsoever to shields, just saying "no mundane equipment that's not armour unless it's magical". Under that condition, it looks like magical shields are allowed.

So, sorry, my mistake.


--------------------
A bad simile is like a leaky screwdriver.

user posted image
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


Topic OptionsPages: (2) [1] 2 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree (Terms of Use: Updated 7/7/05) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1354 seconds | Archive
Visit www.warhammerworkshop.com and www.warhammerforums.com!
Vote for us on Warvault!